We are Brothers

Matot-Masei

Num. 30:2 – 36:13

 

Précis: Matot begins with a speech to the heads (matot) of the tribes concerning the importance and sacredness of vows. The tribes of Reuben and Gad express their desire to dwell east of the Jordan, and are permitted to do so, after promising to enter the Land to help the rest of the People defeat the Canaanites.

The Book of Numbers ends with Masei. “These are the stages (masei) of the journey” which the Israelites made through the desert. In what amounts to a recapitulation, all of the stops along the way are identified. 

 

Num. 32:6 “Are your brothers to go to war while you stay here?”
           

The Gadites and the Reubanites ask Moses’ permission to stay on the eastern side of the Jordan, outside of the Promised Land. Moses accuses them of abandoning the nation, and they respond that they will serve as the “shock troops” for battle and make no claim for land west of the Jordan.
            The use of the word “brother” is a textural reminder of a previous story from Genesis, that of the separation of Abraham and Lot. (Gen 13:8 “So Abram said to Lot, “Let us not have any quarreling between us, or between your herders and mine, for we are brothers”). As with the tribes of Reuben and Gad, Lot chose land suitable for his herds, close to the Jordan. As was the case with the tribes, when Lot was threatened it was Abraham who raised a military force to rescue his "brother."

The story of the tribes and that of Abraham and Lot are different in one key respect: The tribes of Moses’ time are not playing Lot’s role, since they are active in defense of their brothers as opposed to needing saving. What the stories have in common is that when families are separated geographically, it is not easy to remain emotionally close. Many of us have experienced this in our own lives.

We in America find ourselves on the other side of an ocean from our “brothers” in Israel. There can be no doubt that Israel continues to be threatened both militarily and politically, and we have also seen that we in America are threatened with antisemitism caused by those who conflate criticism of Israel’s current government with Jews wherever we dwell.

Whatever side of the ocean we find ourselves on, we cannot forget that we share a covenant and destiny with our brothers. 

Joshua or Pinchas?

Pinchas

Num. 25:10 - 30:1

 

Précis: This parasha begins with a reward for Pinchas’ zealotry in slaying the offending adulterers at the conclusion of the previous parasha (the hereditary High Priesthood). The laws of inheritance are amended to provide, at least in certain cases, for daughters to inherit their fathers’ estates. Joshua is appointed the successor to Moses as leader of the People. The parasha then shifts to details of sacrifices.  

Num. 27:15 -16 “And Moses spoke to Adonai saying, ‘Let Adonai, God of the spirit of all flesh, appoint a man over the congregation who will go in front of them and who will bring them out and who will bring them in, so that Adonai’s congregation won’t be like sheep without a shepherd.…’”

 

Once Moses has accepted that a new leader for Israel is required, the question then turns to whom the succession will fall.  There were probably three potential followers. First, it could be the military leader Joshua, who displayed his virtue during the episode of the spies.  Second, it might have been Pinchas, who had just been awarded the most significant religious leadership position, that of High Priest, due to his zealotry. Finally, it could have been Moses’ own first-born son, given that primogeniture was the rule among nations at that time.  But it was Joshua who was selected. Why?

            Traditional commentary states that Moses feared Pinchas’ zealotry, since tolerance is an essential part of leadership. Moses’ sons, according to Midrash, refused to study Torah (a metaphor for not following God’s Law). Joshua alone had demonstrated the ability to lead as a shepherd tends his flock and had shown faith in God. He thus merited the leadership role.

            As we celebrate America’s 250^th anniversary this Shabbat, we should consider the kind of leadership we have now, and the kind of leadership we should work for in the coming months and years. May God grant us Joshuas and save us from Pinchases as we enter the next phase of the American Experiment.