Friday, October 5, 2012

Doom and Gloom, or Redemption


For Shabbat Chol Moed Sukkot:
As has happened so often during the long history of the Jewish People, this year as we celebrate Sukkot, the Jewish People face a threat  which some have characterized as “existential” (particularly with regard to Iran’s nuclear threat to Israel). Our tradition has its own apocalyptic motifs within it which are part of our readings this Shabbat. 
During Sukkot,  it is customary to read the Book of Kohelet (Ecclesiastes). Among its themes are the need to accept the realities of life, recognizing that life's struggles are nothing but a form of “havel” (vanity or emptiness). Many read the book, attributed to Solomon, as downbeat and despairing. The haftarah for Shabbat Chol HaMoed Sukkot contains explicit horrors, but ends with a promise of redemption. In it we read Ezekiel’s description of a future battle against Gog in the land of Magog which will take place just prior to God’s ultimate victory and the inauguration of the Messianic era. His vision suggests a world entirely engulfed in war, with earthquakes, storms, hail, and fiery brimstone. He states that it will take Israel seven months to bury the dead invaders! 
Why did the Sages select this reading for the Shabbat during Sukkot?  Ordinarily, it is not too difficult to see a connection between the Torah reading (here about the Sukkot sacrifices) and the haftarah. But here, the tone of the two are strikingly different, at least on the surface. Sukkot is a time of joy, while the haftarah is grim and downcast. Why do we have this discussion of Gog and Magog, who in rabbinic thought become ultimate symbols of destruction?
It has been suggested that we read this haftarah because it is a tale that will be well-received by the oppressed. Through two millennia, the Jewish People were often oppressed, and Gog and Magog became symbols of the oppressors who could not be named without fear of retribution. The eventual prophesied triumph was a promise of Redemption to a people who experienced only pain and subjugation, and the promise came at a time when their continued existence was as flimsy as a Sukkah.
When we link Sukkot to Ezekiel’s vision, we are expressing our hope that the “doom and gloom” we read in Kohelet is to be replaced by an ultimate triumph, of a time when war is no longer learned, and when spears are turned into pruning hooks.
It is also a reminder that the struggles we face day to day in our relations with others, or in our relations with the community and fellow Jews, should not blind us to the potential of good we can perform. Despite Ezekiel’s predictions of destruction, we need to keep in mind that Sukkot is “z’man simchatenu” – a time of our joy.

Friday, September 28, 2012

The Past, the future


Haazinu
Deuteronomy 32:1 -52

PrĂ©cis: The parasha begins with the “Song of Moses,” a hymn sung by Moses within sight of the Promised Land. The song contrasts God’s fidelity to the faithlessness of the People and the need of the People to learn from their history under God’s care. Moses predicts that Israel’s enemies will be overcome. Moses is told to climb a mountain to see the Promised Land he will not to enter, as he prepares for his death. This is the last parasha read on Shabbat in the annual cycle: the final parasha (V’zot Habracha) is read traditionally on Simchat Torah.

(Deuteronomy 32:7) “Ask your parent, who will inform you…”
(Deuteronomy 32: 46) “Take to heart all the words with which I have warned you this day. Enjoin them upon your children, that they may observe faithfully all the terms of this Teaching.”

             In his final speech to the People, Moses presents them with two different visions. He first castigates them for their failing during the years in the desert, reminding them that they must learn from their errors. (Deuteronomy 32:7). Look to the past and learn the lessons of your pious ancestors!

But then Moses instructs the People that they are responsible for looking forward, to teach their children about the need for fidelity to God and to fulfill the terms of the Covenant. Is this indeed a dichotomy, or is there a more subtly message being presented?

If one looks at the entirety of the Bible, from the Five Books of Moses to the prophets and to the writings, we see a steady separation of God from humanity. The God who walked in the cool of the evening with Adam in the Garden has become ever more remote. Moses may have spoken with God, but after Moses, God’s Voice comes in dreams or through visions, when they come at all. Our tradition insists, however, that a Messianic Redemption will come some day. Thus, while the historical God seems remote, we maintain a belief in His promise of future salvation.

In his deft way, Moses’ final pronouncements hint at the duality of our tradition: reverence for the past, and hope for the future. To use another metaphor, we are links in a chain, relying upon the strength of those who have come before, overcoming struggle, facing danger, yet surviving with a belief that a better day lies ahead of us: for our people, our families, our congregations, and all of Israel.