R’eih
Deuteronomy 11:26 - 16:17
Précis: Moses begins by saying “Behold (r’eih) I set before you a blessing and a curse this day.” God sets the blessing and curse before the people, depending on whether or not they obey the commandments. A concern with idolatry permeates the ensuing verses. The parasha explains that there will be only one site for sacrifices. A test for a false prophet and the punishment of an idolatrous city are included. The parasha then shifts to other subjects: the prohibition against self-mutilation, the biblical basis of the laws of kashrut, tithing so that the Levite, the "stranger, the fatherless, and the widow” are taken care of. Remission of debts in the seventh year, care of the poor, freeing of Hebrew slaves in the seventh year, and the dedication of the firstborn of cattle and flock to God are discussed, as are the commandments for the observance of Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot.
Deut. 15:4 - "There shall be no needy among you."
Deut. 15:11- "There will never cease to be needy ones in your land, which is why I command you to open your hand to the poor."
In the space of only seven verses, the Torah reading seems to give us two diametrically opposed ideas: there will be no needy among you, but there will never cease to be needy ones in your land. How are we to reconcile these statements?
As usual, the Sages saw the same textual problems we see today, and had a solution for apparent ambiguity. The Talmud offers an alternative translation for the first verse: they read it to mean "there shall be no needy within you " (Baba Metzia 33b). From this interpretation, they infer a mitzvah to earn a sufficient living to support oneself and one's family. To underscore that charity begins at home, they note that one may not impoverish oneself by giving too much charity, and in fact they establish a maximum charitable level of 20% of income (Ketubot 50a).
During the current era of economic uncertainty, it is unlikely that pulpit rabbis will be haranguing their congregations not to impoverish themselves by giving too much tzedakah. But they should be talking about the necessity of helping others who are in dire circumstances. As is stated in the Shulchan Aruch (the 16th century legal code), everyone is required to give tzedakah – even those who are indigent. Giving to others is such a basic concept that we are commanded to give sufficient alms to the poor so that they, too, can give alms to other poor persons.
This latter concept seems to be derived from the second verse we study this week. As noted by Rabbi Lauren Eichler Berkun in the JTS Chancellor's Weekly Commentary (8/3/02), the language used in this verse is very instructive. The Hebrew word used for a “needy person” is "ev'yon" and not the normal word for a poor person ("oni"). Rashi, she notes, explains that "ev'yon" comes from a Hebrew word meaning "longing or desire." Therefore, according to Rashi, an "ev'yon" is one "who longs for everything."
When one is in economic distress, one is also often in emotional distress: one can “long for everything” to restore stability and security. But when we long for everything we can lose the ability to see the needs of others and to respond to their needs. The second verse we study this week encourages us to understand those "longings" within us - so that we can be more generous to our families, friends, colleagues and community members who need our support.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Is it Really So Simple?
Ekev
Deuteronomy 7:12 - 11:25
Précis: Moses continues his recapitulation of the law to the people, reminding them to be obedient to God’s laws as they struggle with the Canaanites. Moses describes in detail all of the blessings which God had bestowed upon them, and commands them to bless and thank God for the bounty they receive. On the other hand, they should learn the lesson of rebelliousness of their fathers, including the incident of the Golden Calf. Moses reminds the people that he brought down a second set of tablets, which require their continued obedience to God.
Deuteronomy 10:12-13 “And now, O Israel, what does the Lord your God demand of you? Only this: to revere the Lord your God, to walk only in His paths, to love Him, and to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and soul, keeping the Lord's commandments and laws, which I enjoin upon you today, for your good.”
In recent weeks, we have seen how supposedly “observant” rabbis have been caught in sting operations involving everything from bribery to money laundering to the sale of human organs. I am fairly confident that those accused pray frequently – and perhaps with sincere fervor. But if they are indeed guilty of these crimes, they have been guilty of a greater sin: the willful ignoring of the simple requirement of the verse we read this week – to walk in God’s path – by participating in the complexities of ritual practices while they ignore real world ethical behavior. Moreover, it is unfortunate that these individuals are only the latest in a line of “observant” Jews to run afoul of legal (and ethical) behavior. Agriprocessors comes to mind in this connection.
Nor are these failures unique to the Orthodox community. Reform and Conservative clergy have in recent years been found guilty of crimes ranging from child abuse to fraud to murder, and examples of criminal conduct are all too common among the Israeli government leadership.
How can we begin to understand the failure of our leaders to follow the “simple” rule set forth in our verse this week?
Writing in the JTS Chancellor’s Weekly Commentary (8/23/08) Rabbi Marc Wolf took note of the concept of “Simplexity” – the idea that very complex systems can appear on the surface to be very simple. He notes that many new technological gadgets, like an iPhone, are so intuitive that they don’t even come with instruction manuals! Yet “simplexity” is not so simple: what may look simple on the surface may be very complex, and that which appears complex may really be quite simple in reality. (Physicists among the readers, if any, may here cite Einstein’s most famous equation of E=m2 as an example of how an incredibly complex universe can be simply explained.)
Returning to our verse, we ask whether having a good relationship with God really can be that simple? “Only this”? If so, why do we have the Mishnah, the Talmud, various codes of law, etc. etc., which all seem to make the simple so incredibly complex.
Rabbi Wolf suggests that the answer itself is pretty “simple.” We understand that the text tells us to walk in God’s way, and we ask, “how?” It is about the “how” that our sages have labored. They tell us that the “how” is through observing the mitzvot which appear throughout the Torah (and by further extension, through the Mishnah, Talmud, and their own exegeses).
I would submit, however, that such an interpretation of “how” can lead to a mindless, rote repetition of actions which, being separated from their holy purpose, become the empty ritual about which the prophets (particularly Isaiah) castigated the people. The so-called “observant” Jew who is fastidious about following the detail of ritual life may well miss the forest for the trees: the reason we recite brachot when taking actions throughout the day (upon awaking, washing, eating, etc.) is not for the sake of obeying a command but rather is a simple reminder of God’s presence in our lives. The reason we walk in God’s path is to create and participate in a moral, ethical community.
To be Jewish is to wrestle with God. Perhaps we are horrified by the failings of Jewish leaders not only because we expect “more” of them, but because we recognize that we may share the same human failings. Perhaps we should feel compassion for the latest group of Jews to run afoul of civil law. But we should also be reminded this week that 2,000 years of complexity can obscure our simple obligation to follow God’s path.
Deuteronomy 7:12 - 11:25
Précis: Moses continues his recapitulation of the law to the people, reminding them to be obedient to God’s laws as they struggle with the Canaanites. Moses describes in detail all of the blessings which God had bestowed upon them, and commands them to bless and thank God for the bounty they receive. On the other hand, they should learn the lesson of rebelliousness of their fathers, including the incident of the Golden Calf. Moses reminds the people that he brought down a second set of tablets, which require their continued obedience to God.
Deuteronomy 10:12-13 “And now, O Israel, what does the Lord your God demand of you? Only this: to revere the Lord your God, to walk only in His paths, to love Him, and to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and soul, keeping the Lord's commandments and laws, which I enjoin upon you today, for your good.”
In recent weeks, we have seen how supposedly “observant” rabbis have been caught in sting operations involving everything from bribery to money laundering to the sale of human organs. I am fairly confident that those accused pray frequently – and perhaps with sincere fervor. But if they are indeed guilty of these crimes, they have been guilty of a greater sin: the willful ignoring of the simple requirement of the verse we read this week – to walk in God’s path – by participating in the complexities of ritual practices while they ignore real world ethical behavior. Moreover, it is unfortunate that these individuals are only the latest in a line of “observant” Jews to run afoul of legal (and ethical) behavior. Agriprocessors comes to mind in this connection.
Nor are these failures unique to the Orthodox community. Reform and Conservative clergy have in recent years been found guilty of crimes ranging from child abuse to fraud to murder, and examples of criminal conduct are all too common among the Israeli government leadership.
How can we begin to understand the failure of our leaders to follow the “simple” rule set forth in our verse this week?
Writing in the JTS Chancellor’s Weekly Commentary (8/23/08) Rabbi Marc Wolf took note of the concept of “Simplexity” – the idea that very complex systems can appear on the surface to be very simple. He notes that many new technological gadgets, like an iPhone, are so intuitive that they don’t even come with instruction manuals! Yet “simplexity” is not so simple: what may look simple on the surface may be very complex, and that which appears complex may really be quite simple in reality. (Physicists among the readers, if any, may here cite Einstein’s most famous equation of E=m2 as an example of how an incredibly complex universe can be simply explained.)
Returning to our verse, we ask whether having a good relationship with God really can be that simple? “Only this”? If so, why do we have the Mishnah, the Talmud, various codes of law, etc. etc., which all seem to make the simple so incredibly complex.
Rabbi Wolf suggests that the answer itself is pretty “simple.” We understand that the text tells us to walk in God’s way, and we ask, “how?” It is about the “how” that our sages have labored. They tell us that the “how” is through observing the mitzvot which appear throughout the Torah (and by further extension, through the Mishnah, Talmud, and their own exegeses).
I would submit, however, that such an interpretation of “how” can lead to a mindless, rote repetition of actions which, being separated from their holy purpose, become the empty ritual about which the prophets (particularly Isaiah) castigated the people. The so-called “observant” Jew who is fastidious about following the detail of ritual life may well miss the forest for the trees: the reason we recite brachot when taking actions throughout the day (upon awaking, washing, eating, etc.) is not for the sake of obeying a command but rather is a simple reminder of God’s presence in our lives. The reason we walk in God’s path is to create and participate in a moral, ethical community.
To be Jewish is to wrestle with God. Perhaps we are horrified by the failings of Jewish leaders not only because we expect “more” of them, but because we recognize that we may share the same human failings. Perhaps we should feel compassion for the latest group of Jews to run afoul of civil law. But we should also be reminded this week that 2,000 years of complexity can obscure our simple obligation to follow God’s path.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)